I like animals. They are nice as pets. And I’m happy paying an extra buck for eggs from chickens that don’t poop on top of each other.
But I don’t really wanna give extra bucks to a charity for animals. I’d rather give it to a charity for humans.
Animals versus humans is something that pops up in philanthropy chatter every so often. Last October, Martin Brookes at New
Philanthropy Capital, a London-based philanthropic advising firm, wrote
about the gross imbalance between charities addressing domestic violence and .... He posted this chart:
It prompted much discussion, but unfortunately, I could not get past the incredible notion of a Donkey Sanctuary. A little heaven for stinky beasts with stubby tails ACTUALLY EXISTS!
I want to go to there.
And then, OMG scandal! Mr. Brookes wrote just a few days ago that he himself “adopted” a donkey and gave to the Sanctuary on a trip with his daughter, as an act of dad-love.
No one’s asking for it, but my opinion on this is only that Mr. Brookes was wonderfully honest in writing about this on the interwebs.
Of course, other bloggers are picking this up and chatting about it,
was he right, was he wrong? And yet, remarkably, not one has yet
written that Mr. Brookes was concerned about saving his ass.
It appears I have not their self-restraint.
Since my brain cannot stop laughing at any and every and all things Donkey Sanctuary, I’m going to have to take another angle on the
animals versus domestic violence debate. Although this event didn’t
happen in philanthropy, most folks are still familiar with it.
Remember Michael Vick?
He tortured and killed dogs and was vilified for it by the public. The Falcons sued and won for $20 million back of Vick’s signing bonus
and the NFL indefinitely suspended him, conditionally lifting the
punishment over two years later. Meanwhile, when athletes committed
violence against PEOPLE, the following happened:
By not addressing these violent acts, the NBA & NFL & Major Leagues were clearly failing in an extraordinary way. But so were we,
the public, for not expressing a fraction of the outrage that was felt
with Michael Vick. One more fun fact:
That worked. I’m not laughing anymore.
When did our outrage about animals dwarf our outrage over the treament of our fellow human beings?
The only way I could convince myself to give toward an animal charity with my friends was to ask that the gift not go
toward animal rights advocacy but instead for the neutering of
animals. At least that way I could stretch an argument that the
charity is helping people by keeping down the number of strays in the
human communities.
Yeah, it was a pretty big stretch.
Now, if only the SPCA neutered asses. That would have a impact on domestic violence for sure.
Day 20: $30 to Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Tags:
© Copyright 2009 Social Actions, Some Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Contact
You need to be a member of My Social Actions to add comments!
Join My Social Actions